Publications
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
2009 |
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
2003 |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
1998 |
Bendezú F.O., Martin S.G., 2013. Cdc42 explores the cell periphery for mate selection in fission yeast.
Current Biology
23(1) pp. 42-47. [DOI]
[Web of Science]
[Pubmed]
Kokkoris K., 2013. Linking microtubules to the activation of CDC42 in fission yeast. 152 p., Université de Lausanne, Faculté de biologie et médecine, Martin, S. (dir.). [Document]
Merlini L., Dudin O., Martin S.G., 2013. Mate and fuse: how yeast cells do it.
Open Biology
3(3) p. 130008. [DOI]
[Pubmed]
Bendezú F.O., Martin S.G., 2012. Cdc42 oscillations in yeasts.
Science Signaling
5(253) pp. pe53. [DOI]
[Web of Science]
[Pubmed]
Bendezú F.O., Vincenzetti V., Martin S.G., 2012. Fission yeast Sec3 and Exo70 are transported on actin cables and localize the exocyst complex to cell poles.
PLoS One
7(6) pp. e40248. [DOI]
[Web of Science]
[Pubmed]
Hachet O., Bendezú F.O., Martin S.G., 2012. Fission yeast: in shape to divide.
Current Opinion in Cell Biology
24(6) pp. 858-864. [DOI]
[Web of Science]
[Pubmed]
Lo Presti L., Chang F., Martin S.G., 2012. Myosin Vs organize actin cables in fission yeast.
Molecular Biology of the Cell
23(23) pp. 4579-4591. [DOI]
[Web of Science]
[Pubmed]
Martin S.G., 2012. Being at the right place at the right time.
Molecular Biology of the Cell
23(21) pp. 4148-4150. [DOI]
[Web of Science]
[Pubmed]
Bendezú F.O., Martin S.G., 2011. Actin cables and the exocyst form two independent morphogenesis pathways in the fission yeast.
Molecular Biology of the Cell
22(1) pp. 44-53. [DOI]
[Web of Science]
[Pubmed]
Hachet O., Berthelot-Grosjean M., Kokkoris K., Vincenzetti V., Moosbrugger J., Martin S.G., 2011. A phosphorylation cycle shapes gradients of the DYRK family kinase Pom1 at the plasma membrane.
Cell
145(7) pp. 1116-1128. [DOI]
[Web of Science]
[Pubmed]
Lo Presti L., Martin S.G., 2011. Shaping fission yeast cells by rerouting actin-based transport on microtubules.
Current Biology
21(24) pp. 2064-2069. [DOI]
[Web of Science]
[Pubmed]
Martin S., 2011. Deconstructing the cell cycle.
Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology
12(11) p. 689. [DOI]
[Web of Science]
[Pubmed]
Amin N., Khan A., St Johnston D., Tomlinson I., Martin S., Brenman J., McNeill H., 2009. LKB1 regulates polarity remodeling and adherens junction formation in the Drosophila eye.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
106(22) pp. 8941-8946. [DOI]
[Web of Science]
[Pubmed]
Chang F., Martin S.G., 2009. Shaping fission yeast with microtubules.
Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology
1(1) pp. a001347. [Document]
[DOI]
[Web of Science]
[Pubmed]
Martin S.G., 2009. Geometric control of the cell cycle.
Cell Cycle
8(22) pp. 3643-3647. [DOI]
[Web of Science]
[Pubmed]
Martin S.G., 2009. Microtubule-dependent cell morphogenesis in the fission yeast.
Trends in Cell Biology
19(9) pp. 447-454. [DOI]
[Web of Science]
[Pubmed]
Martin S.G., Berthelot-Grosjean M., 2009. Polar gradients of the DYRK-family kinase Pom1 couple cell length with the cell cycle.
Nature
459(7248) pp. 852-856. [DOI]
[Web of Science]
[Pubmed]
Rincón S.A., Ye Y., Villar-Tajadura M.A., Santos B., Martin S.G., Pérez P., 2009. Pob1 participates in the Cdc42 regulation of fission yeast actin cytoskeleton.
Molecular Biology of the Cell
20(20) pp. 4390-4399. [DOI]
[Web of Science]
[Pubmed]
Martin S.G., Rincón S.A., Basu R., Pérez P., Chang F., 2007. Regulation of the formin for3p by cdc42p and bud6p.
Molecular Biology of the Cell
18(10) pp. 4155-4167. [DOI]
[Web of Science]
[Pubmed]
Martin S.G., Chang F., 2006. Dynamics of the formin for3p in actin cable assembly.
Current Biology
16(12) pp. 1161-1170. [DOI]
[Web of Science]
[Pubmed]
Padte N.N., Martin S.G., Howard M., Chang F., 2006. The cell-end factor pom1p inhibits mid1p in specification of the cell division plane in fission yeast.
Current Biology
16(24) pp. 2480-2487. [DOI]
[Web of Science]
[Pubmed]
Chang F., Feierbach B., Martin S., 2005. Regulation of actin assembly by microtubules in fission yeast cell polarity.
Novartis Foundation Symposium
269 pp. 59-66; discussion 66-72, 223-30. [Pubmed]
Martin S.G., Chang F., 2005. New end take off: regulating cell polarity during the fission yeast cell cycle.
Cell Cycle
4(8) pp. 1046-1049. [Web of Science]
[Pubmed]
Martin S.G., McDonald W.H., Yates J.R., Chang F., 2005. Tea4p links microtubule plus ends with the formin for3p in the establishment of cell polarity.
Developmental Cell
8(4) pp. 479-491. [DOI]
[Web of Science]
[Pubmed]
Martin S.G., Chang F., 2003. Cell polarity: a new mod(e) of anchoring.
Current Biology
13(18) pp. R711-R713. [DOI]
[Web of Science]
[Pubmed]
Martin S.G., Leclerc V., Smith-Litière K., St Johnston D., 2003. The identification of novel genes required for Drosophila anteroposterior axis formation in a germline clone screen using GFP-Staufen.
Development
130(17) pp. 4201-4215. [DOI]
[Web of Science]
[Pubmed]
Martin S.G., St Johnston D., 2003. A role for Drosophila LKB1 in anterior-posterior axis formation and epithelial polarity.
Nature
421(6921) pp. 379-384. [DOI]
[Web of Science]
[Pubmed]
Maillet L., Gaden F., Brevet V., Fourel G., Martin S.G., Dubrana K., Gasser S.M., Gilson E., 2001. Ku-deficient yeast strains exhibit alternative states of silencing competence.
EMBO Reports
2(3) pp. 203-210. [DOI]
[Web of Science]
[Pubmed]
Martin S.G., Dobi K.C., St Johnston D., 2001. A rapid method to map mutations in Drosophila.
Genome Biology
2(9) p. 0036.1. [Document]
[DOI]
[Web of Science]
[Pubmed]
Laroche T., Martin S.G., Tsai-Pflugfelder M., Gasser S.M., 2000. The dynamics of yeast telomeres and silencing proteins through the cell cycle.
Journal of Structural Biology
129(2-3) pp. 159-174. [DOI]
[Web of Science]
[Pubmed]
Martin S.G., Laroche T., Suka N., Grunstein M., Gasser S.M., 1999. Relocalization of telomeric Ku and SIR proteins in response to DNA strand breaks in yeast.
Cell
97(5) pp. 621-633. [DOI]
[Web of Science]
[Pubmed]
Cockell M., Gotta M., Palladino F., Martin S.G., Gasser S.M., 1998. Targeting Sir proteins to sites of action: a general mechanism for regulated repression.
Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology
63 pp. 401-412. [DOI]
[Web of Science]
[Pubmed]
Laroche T., Martin S.G., Gotta M., Gorham H.C., Pryde F.E., Louis E.J., Gasser S.M., 1998. Mutation of yeast Ku genes disrupts the subnuclear organization of telomeres.
Current Biology
8(11) pp. 653-656. [DOI]
[Web of Science]
[Pubmed]
