Vademecum for Supervisors of thesis

Transitional adaptation for private colloquia and public defenses of theses (as of November 4, 2020)

Private colloquia continue to be held as much as possible by videoconference. If they take place in person because the participants wish or for technical reasons, the rules laid down by the OFSP continue to apply in the premises used at UNIL.

At the end of the private colloquium, and depending on the result, the jury and the candidate propose a date at least three weeks after the date of the private symposium, in accordance with usual practice.

Public defenses can no longer take place in full attendance (jury, candidate and public) from November 4, 2020: they are allowed within the limit of 10 persons, with a new restriction however: they can only gather the persons directly involved in the defense and evaluation of the thesis, and are therefore closed as such to any external audience. The latter can be invited only in the form of a videoconference

The presentation is limited to a duration of 40 to 45 minutes and the candidate then answers questions from the jury which may also relate to scientific communication, the transmission of science to the general public (scientific mediation) in the field of his thesis.

The public defense in partial presence is then carried out in front of a video camera and retransmitted by digital means to the public or part of the public (transmission of the Zoom/Webex link to the public for example).

When the public defense is entirely by videoconference (jury, candidate, public), it takes place under the same conditions of duration and exchange with the jury as in partial face-to-face.

The doctoral students' secretariat is at your disposal in case of questions and for the concrete organisation related to the procedures mentioned above. Please contact Mrs Joëlle Richard.

We would like to remind you that these are transitional measures, subject to modifications within a fairly short period of time. In this context, we try to preserve as much as possible the interests of the candidates and the juries.

Steps related to the printing of the thesis

The situation is now back to normal (printing and then physical deposit at the Cantonal University Library (BCU) and other copies requested in the Faculty).

This is a summary of the main steps

In the event of any questions or disputes, only the current regulations are authoritative. The FGSE Doctoral Regulations clarify the role of each of the actors involved in the Thesis. The role of the Thesis director is essentially specified in articles 5 (Thesis director) and 10 (Thesis co-director). The role of the PhD student in article 11. The Thesis is described in articles 1 and 16.

Before the PhD - Initial steps

1. When discussing potential studies at UNIL with a potential doctoral student: discuss your and his/her expectations for the doctoral studies and later career plans, identify and explain the funding situation, define potential research topics.

2. Inform the candidate about the thesis supervisory committee and how it works.

3. Inform the candidate of the following documents and services:

  • FGSE doctoral regulations (especially art. 11, 4, 14 & 15)
  • UNIL doctoral charter • Institute secretariat (IGD, IDYST, or ISTE)
  • Doctoral secretariat (Dean Office, FGSE)
  • Immatriculation office - (SII-UNIL)
  • Graduate campus (GC-UNIL)

4. Depending on the type of doctoral student (assistant, FNS, other funds, independent), advise the student on the relevant procedures. Explain that the process of academic immatriculation for studies (with SII) is separate from human resources procedures with the Institute (contract, office space, etc.):

  • Academic (PhD): Doctoral secretariat (FGSE) + SII.
  • HRS if relevant (contract) : Secretariat of your institute + HRS.
  • Other respects (Campus card, office space, phone, copiers, etc.) : Secretariat of the institute.

5. Inform your doctoral candidate that he or she must immediately register with SII (irrespective of his or her status or contracts). Inscription can take place at any time during the year, with inscriptions received before 31 July valid for autumn semester and before 30 Nov for the spring semester. To do so, after having contacted the SII, the student must fill in two copies of the form (Attestation de thèse). You must sign both copies and your doctoral candidate submits them to the doctoral secretariat.

Notes regarding the Attestation form: The question « section/branche/orientation » can only include one of the four following options for PhDs: Geography, Geology, Environmental Science/Studies, or Tourism Studies.This choice can be changed later (up until the private thesis defence).

The “Attestation” form is then signed by the Vice-Dean and submitted to the SII for final decision on admission. Note that the status of doctoral student is only granted upon final decision by the SII, after evaluation of the student’s formal qualifications (including equivalence of foreign degrees).

6. If you are considering having a co-director of the thesis (or if your status requires it), he or she needs to be approved by the Faculty Council. Prepare a letter addressed to the Vice-Dean, signed by yourself, the proposed co-director, the student, (and if relevant the rapporteur/referent) explaining the situation and how responsibilities will be divided between the director and the co-director. For a co-director external to the Faculty, a CV with publication list must be attached.

During the PhD

7. Clarify as far as possible from the beginning your expectations in terms of: presence, personal involvement, frequency of meetings (supervision meetings, group or laboratory meetings, Institute meetings, ...), communication, attachment to an external doctoral school (CUSO, other...), etc.

8. You are responsible to establish, in consultation with your student, the thesis supervisory committee (see Reg Doc article 5.3, and 14). The composition of the committee may evolve over time.

The first meeting of the thesis supervisory committee should take place before the end of the first year, or earlier if you or your student deem necessary (for instance, if contract renewal depends on such a meeting). Further meetings should take place on an annual basis.

During the thesis supervisory committee meetings, the student presents his or her progress and plans for the future. The “Thesis committee report” form is designed to facilitate this process. Ensure that the student prepares an activity report before the meeting and, together with the student, prepare the meeting report for submission to the Dean’s office (at a minimum after the first meeting).

9. Respond to the annual Graduate Campus survey of your assessment of your students each year (compulsory). Attention :

  1. This is obligatory
  2. Unless legally required, your response does not necessarily result in any action by the Graduate Campus or the Faculty.
  3. This process is separate and complementary to the annual reports of the thesis supervisory committee.

Every doctoral student has the opportunity to fill in a similar survey form.

10. In case of difficulties during the supervision of a thesis, do not wait.

  1. Privilege direct and transparent discussions with the doctoral student as soon as a problem appears (cf. art. 15)
  2. Keep notes and records, in particular the annual thesis committee report
  3. If necessary, call an extraordinary meeting of the thesis supervisory committee
  4. There are several avenues for further discussion and action
    • The Dean’s office (Vice-dean Research, Research administrator, or doctoral secretary) may be contacted informally for advice
    • The case should be notified formally to the Vice-Dean if it warrants
    • Graduate Campus is available for advice for doctoral students and supervisors.
    • The SHR can advise on contractual, human resources issues
    • Mediation services.
  5. If the issue concerns only assistantship (HR, not academic issue), take contact with the institute direction first; if it concerns an FNS or other third part funding, please contact the Vice-Dean too. The SHR can advise on contractual, human resources issues
At least six weeks before the private defence

11. Submit to the Vice-Dean a proposed list of jury members, co-signed by the doctoral student (and if relevant co-director and rapporteur). Include their full names, (main) university, and email, as well as the proposed dates(s) and time(s) for the defense. See Reg Doc article 17-21 for details.

One week before the private defense at the latest

12. Like all other jury members, you must submit a confidential report on the thesis submitted by your student including your evaluation of the thesis to the President of the Jury (via the doctoral secretariat). The defense cannot take place without this document. The doctoral secretariat collects the other jury members’ reports. These reports are only for internal use by the president of the jury and are thus confidential (refer to RegDoc art. 20.4).

Before the public defence

13. If the jury has requested modifications and designated you to approve them, coordinate with the student to have time to evaluate the modifications. Your formal validation will be usually required by the doctoral secretariat after these modifications (RegDoc art. 22.1).

14. The date of the public defence is decided by the jury with the candidate, and the organisation is coordinated by the doctoral secretariat.

Public defence

15. For the public defence, you (the director), the co-director (if relevant), the president, and at least one of the experts must be present (the Referent may replace if they exist). In case of force majeure, presence by visioconference may be arranged.

Suivez nous:  

FGSE Doctoral Secretariat

Joëlle Richard
Géopolis - office 4611
CH-1015 Lausanne

Tel: +41 (0)21 692 62 93

Absent on Friday